The red herring fallacy falls into the other category, informal fallacies.

If a food is cold, then it is a dessert.

Take a look at this example of the non-sequitur fallacy: For example, the non-sequitur fallacy, the type of fallacy where the conclusion does not logically follow the premise, is a formal fallacy. Formal fallacies are statements that are flawed because the structure of the statement itself is flawed.

Logical fallacies can be broadly divided into two categories: formal and informal fallacies. But for the purposes of this post, weвЂ™ll be focusing on the red herring fallacy as itвЂ™s used in rhetoric. This isnвЂ™t always for nefarious purposes-sometimes, itвЂ™s a literary strategy used to keep readers in suspense. The purpose of a red herring is to distract the reader or listener from the actual issue being discussed in a conversation or piece of writing. The first instance of the term being used figuratively dates to 1807, when political journalist William Cobbett used it to critique the English pressвЂ™ coverage of NapoleonвЂ™s defeat.

In 2008, etymologists Gerald Cohen and Robert Scott Ross published their research that showed that the earliest references to the phrase came from a historical method for training horses, not dogs, to be comfortable with the chaos and competing smells that follow a hunting party. For a long time, the common explanation for this phrase was that a kipper, or a cured herring that becomes pungent and takes on red-colored flesh from the curing process, was used to train hunting dogs to follow scent paths. Write with Grammarly What is the red herring fallacy?ДЄ red herring is a misleading statement, question, or argument meant to redirect a conversation away from its original topic.ДЄ red herring is not an actual species of fish.

Red herring fallacy sentence examples